Welcome to the Korea Discussion Forums!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. Take a look at the list of the forum features here. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Go Back   USFK Forums > Korea Central - 한국 지역 > Pyongyang Discussion - 평양에 대한 토론 > Foreign Policy and North Korea
User Name
Password
Forums Arcade Gallery Links Register FAQ Members List Calendar
Classifieds Articles Quizzes Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  

Foreign Policy and North Korea How should individal, or collective, nations of the world deal with the "North Korea Problem" -- Sunshine? Confrontation? Something inbetween? What issues should guide the policy more? Good-cop Bad-cop? ------- discussion forum


Google
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-21-2007, 09:12 PM
usinkorea's Avatar
usinkorea usinkorea is offline
Super Moderator

 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: GA USA
Age: 37
Posts: 607
Country:

Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
Rep Power: 3
usinkorea is on a distinguished road
Question (Almost) A North Korea Prediction

I'm not ready to make it a full prediction yet...but....

North Korea is being North Korea. Yesterday, the news was that the North Korean negociator in South Korea went on a rant and stormed out of the sessions after the South Korean team started by expressing their wish NK would fullfill its obligations by shutting down the reactor as they promised in the New Nuke Deal.

Today, we read that the Norks delayed the start of the meetings, that were to begin in the morning, until late that evening with a fresh round of suprise demands.

This is all par for the course in North Korea's negociation playbook.

To me ---- this is a clear sign ---- Pyongyang feels really good about its position since the 6 Party Talks cut the deal that was cut.

Back in late-2005, I looked around and decided North Korea was showing signs of really hurting from the slight increases in pressure the US was able to turn up on Pyongyang -- especially the banking pressure.

That led me to predict 2006 would not pass without an ICBM test, and if that didn't get the US to bend, a nuke test would follow (but I thought it would take 4 to 6 to 12 months before the North tried it, which they didn't when they quickly moved to a nuke test).

Now, I am almost ready to predict that within 12 months, or possibly before Jan 1st 2008, NK will fire off another ICBM.

Why?

Not because they are hurting. I still think they are probably hurting:

The US has not eased off its banking moves. It freed the $25 million for NK to pick up, but it appears the banking community believes the US treasury department is still poised to strike at any bank that attempts to re-establish NK's money laundering system that handles its fake dollars, drug proceeds, military hardware and technology sales, fake smokes, and other things......

That means --- a MAJOR source of vital income for the regime is on hold.

But.....I believe the way NK's team is acting in Seoul is a sign:

that Kim Jong Il believes the US & crew are definately on the ropes and caving. I believe it means NK thinks the latest Nuke Deal is a --- sure fire sign of weakness ---- and it has already gotten a fair amount of aid immediately after the deal was struck. (Like SK sending an official with $400,000 in cash in a suitcase to give to NK to "buy video conferencing equipment" for future family reunions).

Much of the world press has been bashing Bush's New Nuke Deal. Bush lost a big election and then flipflopped and floundered around since then.
Even Bush's normal supporters are beating him up on the New Nuke Deal.

I think NK smells blood, and it is doing what it does --- pushing harder.

Given both of these things:

1. the continuing need to get the US to loosen up the screws carefully increased over the last few years

&

2. a belief their recent ICBM and Nuke Tests won them major capitulations at the 6 Party Talks....

I believe if NK does not get relief in the banking sector and/or the shipment of fuel oil and/or rice aid ----

--- it will easily decide shooting up another ICBM is a darn good strategy.

I also think since the last test resulted in the missible being blown up barefly after it got above the launch pad -----

---NK also needs to run another test to judge their equipment and design.

(Which introducing a factor that runs counter to my not-as-yet-prediction:

if NK's ICBM design truly sucks --- and the Koreans know this ---- the failure of the last test might send them back to the drawing board for a couple of years at least ----

----they might not want to test another ICBM ---- because ---

every time they test something that is a clear, unmigated failure ---

Pyongyang fears it has just made a US military strike on it more likely...)
Reply With Quote Submit this thread to digg Submit this thread to del.icio.us
Google Ads
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +9. The time now is 05:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
All rights reserved USFK Forums