Welcome to the Korea Discussion Forums!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. Take a look at the list of the forum features here. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Go Back   USFK Forums > Korea Central - 한국 지역 > General Korea Discussion - 한국에 대한 일반적인
User Name
Password
Forums Arcade Gallery Links Register FAQ Members List Calendar
Classifieds Articles Quizzes Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  

General Korea Discussion - 한국에 대한 일반적인 Discuss anything related to Korea here.


Google
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-16-2006, 08:05 AM
GI Korea's Avatar
GI Korea GI Korea is offline
Junior Officer

 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Where ever the Army sends me.
Posts: 1,003
Country:

Thanks: 1
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts
Rep Power: 0
GI Korea is an unknown quantity at this point
[GI Korea] UN Imposes Sanctions on North Korea

Published: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 07:42:46 +0900


This resolution is actually quite impressive that US Ambassador John Bolton was able to get both the Russians and the Chinese to back this resolution against North Korea:



The U.N. Security Council voted unanimously on Saturday to impose weapons-related sanctions on North Korea in response to its flurry of missile tests earlier this month.


The resolution demands that North Korea suspend "all activities" on its ballistic missile programs.


It requires all U.N. members to prevent imports from or exports to North Korea of missiles and missile-related items as well as materials that could be used in weapons of mass destruction.


To avert a veto from China, the resolution does not mention Chapter 7 of the U.N. Charter, which is used on a legally binding document. But Security Council members say the resolution is mandatory because of the way it is worded.


China and Russia had originally proposed weaker language, but agreed to a tough resolution. They expressed fears that Chapter 7 would lead to military action as in Iraq.



The real judge of this resolution is going to be how well it is enforced.* Remember Saddam Hussein had sanctions leveled against him by the UN and from first hand experience I can tell you that the sanctions did not stop him from buying lots of weapons for his war machine from the usual sources such as the Russians and even so called US allies like France.* So quite possibly the Chinese and Russians signed on to this resolution knowing full well it will only be enforced by the US and the Japanese only.*


Here is what the North Koreans think of the sanctions:



North Korea's envoy to the United Nations warned Saturday his country would be forced to take "strong physical action" should it be pressured on its "self-defensive" missile launches, protesting a resolution passed unanimously by the U.N. Security Council condemning his government.

Amb. Pak Gil-yon, addressing the council, said North Korea "totally rejects" the resolution and vowed Pyongyang will "go on with missile launch exercises as part of its efforts to bolster deterrent for self-defense in the future."
He said the United States has "totally hamstrung efforts" for sincere dialogue on North Korean issues by applying financial sanctions.* He also accused the U.S. of threatening the North with military exercises targeting it.



At least these sanctions are something against North Korea, but don't expect this resolution to solve the North Korea problem.* This resolution just makes it a little bit more difficult for North Korea to import parts for their missiles and in turning selling them internationally.* This just tightens the noose a little bit more on North Korea's sources of hard currency and hopefully will ultimately make them more likely to return to six party talks seeking to make a deal over their nuclear program.* At least that is the hope, but I remain skeptical.


Tags: north korea, sanctions, UN


Ads by AdGenta.com



Read More...
Reply With Quote Submit this thread to digg Submit this thread to del.icio.us
Google Ads
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +9. The time now is 09:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
All rights reserved USFK Forums