![]() |
|
Welcome to the Korea Discussion Forums! You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. Take a look at the list of the forum features here. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
|
|
|||||||
| Forums | Arcade | Gallery | Links | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | |
| Classifieds | Articles | Quizzes | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| General Military Discussion - 군대에 대한 토론 Discuss anything related to the military here |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
[GI Korea] Operational Control Compromise
Published: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 05:16:10 +0900
I love the wording of this compromise:
I'm willing to bet Rumsfeld is leaning towards Oct. 16, 2009. That's between the two given dates, right? This is just a face saving measure for President Roh because he would look even weaker on national security than he already is if he appeared to be trying to kick USFK out the door as soon as possible. I just don't see the operational control issue lingering to 2012, I'm betting on 2009. View & Leave Comments | TrackbacksRead More... |
| Google Ads |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [GI Korea] Operational Control Compromise
I think it will be tied to Yongsan moving to Camp Humphreys. 2011 has been the most common rumor regarding the date of the move. However, the official date is still 2008. When I think about what must occur to completely move to the Hump - I just don't see how it can be completed by 2008. If it remains this date, I wonder why the upgrades that are currently happening and contracted for on Yongsan are still continuing.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [GI Korea] Operational Control Compromise
Jim,
I have worked on camp closeouts before in 2ID and people wondered the same thing why renovations for example were going on when the camp was closing. The reason was because the contract had been signed and paid for prior to the decision to close the camp. Thus the contractors would keep the money for doing nothing if the renovations weren't done. Thus the Army had the contractors complete the renovations anyway so whoever took over the camps would have better buildings to use. Much like with the hospital on Yongsan the Koreans are going to be getting a nice new hospital once the camp hand over is completed. Call it being good neighbors. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: [GI Korea] Operational Control Compromise
Yes,
Once congress passes a funding bill and monies enter into a pipeline it hard to stop the flow. In the states its someones porkbarrel project. I'm not sure how it works here in Korea. I know the PPM Project Management Office at the Corps of Engineers (FED) manages/oversees the money side of most projects (AAFES has their own engineering department, and NAF projects are funded differently). There are at least three civilian Engineering firms who bid on developing the project's blueprints and plans, along with the Corps doing an internal bid, and then the actual work is subcontracted with local construction firms while FED government employees oversee the work from one of the Project Management Offices (I think there is a seperate PMO for the hospital). Guess things get so complicated and so many jobs and salaries are involved it's darn near impossible to stop the snowball once its starts. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|