Welcome to the Korea Discussion Forums!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. Take a look at the list of the forum features here. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Go Back   USFK Forums > Korea Central - 한국 지역 > Military in Korea - 주한미군 > General Military Discussion - 군대에 대한 토론
User Name
Password
Forums Arcade Gallery Links Register FAQ Members List Calendar
Classifieds Articles Quizzes Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  

General Military Discussion - 군대에 대한 토론 Discuss anything related to the military here


Google
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-22-2006, 06:06 AM
GI Korea's Avatar
GI Korea GI Korea is offline
Junior Officer

 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Where ever the Army sends me.
Posts: 1,003
Country:

Thanks: 1
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts
Rep Power: 0
GI Korea is an unknown quantity at this point
[GI Korea] Operational Control Compromise

Published: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 05:16:10 +0900


I love the wording of this compromise:

In a compromise, Korea and the United States agreed Friday to complete the handover of full wartime operational control of Korean troops to Seoul between Oct. 15, 2009 and March 15, 2012. The two sides issued a 14-point joint communiqué at the end of further negotiations after the 38th Security Consultative Meeting headed by Defense Minister Yoon Kwang-ung and his U.S. counterpart Donald Rumsfeld.

I'm willing to bet Rumsfeld is leaning towards Oct. 16, 2009.  That's between the two given dates, right?  This is just a face saving measure for President Roh because he would look even weaker on national security than he already is if he appeared to be trying to kick USFK out the door as soon as possible.  I just don't see the operational control issue lingering to 2012, I'm betting on 2009.

View & Leave Comments | Trackbacks
Read More...
Reply With Quote Submit this thread to digg Submit this thread to del.icio.us
Google Ads
  #2  
Old 10-23-2006, 12:38 AM
Jim's Avatar
Jim Jim is offline
Conscript

 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 74
Country:

Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Rep Power: 0
Jim is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: [GI Korea] Operational Control Compromise

I think it will be tied to Yongsan moving to Camp Humphreys. 2011 has been the most common rumor regarding the date of the move. However, the official date is still 2008. When I think about what must occur to completely move to the Hump - I just don't see how it can be completed by 2008. If it remains this date, I wonder why the upgrades that are currently happening and contracted for on Yongsan are still continuing.
Reply With Quote Submit this thread to digg Submit this thread to del.icio.us
  #3  
Old 10-24-2006, 03:42 PM
GI Korea's Avatar
GI Korea GI Korea is offline
Junior Officer

 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Where ever the Army sends me.
Posts: 1,003
Country:

Thanks: 1
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts
Rep Power: 0
GI Korea is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: [GI Korea] Operational Control Compromise

Jim,

I have worked on camp closeouts before in 2ID and people wondered the same thing why renovations for example were going on when the camp was closing. The reason was because the contract had been signed and paid for prior to the decision to close the camp. Thus the contractors would keep the money for doing nothing if the renovations weren't done. Thus the Army had the contractors complete the renovations anyway so whoever took over the camps would have better buildings to use. Much like with the hospital on Yongsan the Koreans are going to be getting a nice new hospital once the camp hand over is completed. Call it being good neighbors.
Reply With Quote Submit this thread to digg Submit this thread to del.icio.us
  #4  
Old 10-25-2006, 01:56 PM
Jim's Avatar
Jim Jim is offline
Conscript

 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Germany
Posts: 74
Country:

Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Rep Power: 0
Jim is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: [GI Korea] Operational Control Compromise

Yes,

Once congress passes a funding bill and monies enter into a pipeline it hard to stop the flow. In the states its someones porkbarrel project. I'm not sure how it works here in Korea. I know the PPM Project Management Office at the Corps of Engineers (FED) manages/oversees the money side of most projects (AAFES has their own engineering department, and NAF projects are funded differently). There are at least three civilian Engineering firms who bid on developing the project's blueprints and plans, along with the Corps doing an internal bid, and then the actual work is subcontracted with local construction firms while FED government employees oversee the work from one of the Project Management Offices (I think there is a seperate PMO for the hospital).

Guess things get so complicated and so many jobs and salaries are involved it's darn near impossible to stop the snowball once its starts.
Reply With Quote Submit this thread to digg Submit this thread to del.icio.us
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +9. The time now is 06:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
All rights reserved USFK Forums