Welcome to the Korea Discussion Forums!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. Take a look at the list of the forum features here. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Go Back   USFK Forums > Main Category - 주요 항목 > The Lounge - 라운지 > Politics and Religion - 정치와 종교
User Name
Password
Forums Arcade Gallery Links Register FAQ Members List Calendar
Classifieds Articles Quizzes Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  

Politics and Religion - 정치와 종교 Discuss politics and religion here


Google
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-29-2006, 08:35 AM
Ghostface Kill@'s Avatar
Ghostface Kill@ Ghostface Kill@ is offline
Junior Moderator

 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Germany
Age: 26
Posts: 144
Country:

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
Ghostface Kill@ is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via AIM to Ghostface Kill@ Send a message via MSN to Ghostface Kill@
Foreign-language Ballots: Are they good for America?

Quote:
The Washington establishment is shocked at the discovery that Americans don't like the idea of the federal government forcing local governments to provide foreign-language ballots. That's one more indication of how out of touch our leaders are with grass-roots America.

For many months, the establishment had planned a legislative coup to reauthorize the Voting Rights Act for a whopping 25 years (even though it isn't due to expire until 2007). Passage had been confidently announced on May 2 in a bipartisan photo-op news conference on the Capitol steps.

The media were on board. The president was in sync. No need, thought the powers that be, to have hearings or public debate.

No need, even, to allow members of Congress to offer amendments to the bill. So the Rules Committee, exercising its presumed wisdom, ruled against such impertinence.

The Washington Post described the reaction as a "GOP rebellion" that surprised people with its "intensity." Americans in the hinterland are not surprised by the intensity of feeling on this subject, but they are pleasantly encouraged that Republicans in the House had the gumption to stage a rebellion.

For that, we can credit Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, who got 80 House Republicans to sign his letter demanding deletion of the sections of the Voting Rights Act that require state and local governments to print ballots in foreign languages. The letter said, in part, "The multilingual ballot mandate encourages the linguistic division of our nation and contradicts the melting pot ideal that has made us the most successful multiethnic nation on earth."

On May 18, the usually pompous Senate, by 63 to 34, passed the Inhofe amendment to make English our official language and declare that no one has an affirmative right to receive government services in a language other than English. Remarkably, this happened in the midst of the Senate's consideration of the Kennedy-McCain bill to import 66 million foreigners who don't speak English.

Public opinion is clearly on the side of the English language: 27 states have adopted English-language laws. A Zogby poll reported that 79% of Americans favor making English our official language.

Foreign-language ballots make no sense because only U.S. citizens can vote, and foreigners can't be naturalized unless they demonstrate "the ability to read, write and speak words in ordinary usage in the English language."

The Voting Rights Act, first passed in 1965 and reauthorized several times, is a civil rights landmark whose purpose was to assure that blacks will not be denied the right to vote. Although blacks do not need, and never needed, foreign language ballots, the law was hijacked during its 1975 reauthorization by foreign-language pressure groups that had other political goals.

The U.S. has many problems with election machinery, but preventing blacks from voting is no longer one of them. The Voting Rights Act has long since served its original purpose and today is anachronistic and highly discriminatory against nine states that are still required to get Justice Department approval if they make the slightest change in any voting procedure.

Some argue that the U.S. needs to provide foreign-language ballots in order to accommodate native-born Americans who don't speak English. But that argument actually cuts in favor of Rep. King's amendment.

To any extent that it is true that the United States has large numbers of native-born Americans who don't speak English, this means that immigrants are not assimilating into U.S. culture but instead are keeping their native tongue into the second and third generations. All the more reason why America should provide inducements to learn English - such as printing ballots only in English.

America should not become a nation where immigrants continue to live in neighborhoods where they only associate with and do business with others who speak a foreign language, and let their children grow up without learning English. The result is that young people grow up isolated both from the country their parents left behind and from the culture of their adopted country.

Public schools used to be the vehicle by which the children of millions of immigrants from all over the world became Americanized into good and valuable citizens. In recent generations, public schools have failed miserably in their duty to teach English to the children of immigrants, instead allowing them to speak their native tongues in a system of language apartheid (aka bilingual education).

Those who demand foreign-language ballots are having a petty tantrum like French President Chirac who, although he speaks fluent English, deliberately spoke French in a one-to-one interview with President Bush last year, requiring Bush to have an interpreter.

Congress will make a terrible mistake if leadership doesn't allow representatives to vote on King's amendment to delete the requirement for foreign-language ballots from the Voting Rights Act. We don't want to be a bilingual nation and suffer the problems of other countries with "linguistic division."
Holy crap, no, not, never! I strongly agree with the person above me in saying "NO" to foreign-language ballots. This is almost as bad as trying to have the NATIONAL ANTHEM sung in SPANISH! WTF!! In the early 1900's immigrants who came to America had to understand a small amount of spoken English to become US citizens. Later, in the 20's and 30's immigrants where required to understand spoken and written use of the English language. It seems that the Democrats are using this to try and swing the Latino vote, so the Republicans are doing the same. What happens is that America loses from this battle. I don't want to speak Spanish, I don't want my children to speak Spanish either, (although they probabley will) it is perfectly fine to try and hold-on to your heritage. If the immigrants want to become US-citizens and include themselves in American politics they need to speak and understand English. The government should not accommidate those individuals who do not want to make the American transformation.



-Ghost
__________________
To know that we know what we know, and that we do not know what we do not know, that is true knowledge. -Henry David Thoreau

Knowledge is power.

Last edited by Ghostface Kill@ : 07-29-2006 at 11:54 AM.
Reply With Quote Submit this thread to digg Submit this thread to del.icio.us
Google Ads
  #2  
Old 07-29-2006, 03:06 PM
joeninpo's Avatar
joeninpo joeninpo is offline
The Thread Killa

 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cell 225, Bldg 475, Osan ABS
Posts: 320
Country:

Thanks: 2
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Rep Power: 0
joeninpo is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Foreign-language Ballots: Are they good for America?

English is the language to use if you want to survive in a global economy. German, Japanese, and a few others are also very good, but Spanish, French, and most of the other romantic family of languages will never, ever be global languages...especially when it comes to economics.

I don't understand why it's so hard to comprehend the fact that if you MOVE to a new country, then you might want to learn that language so you can COMMUNICATE with everyone else there. Hello?!?!?!? I wouldn't move to Viet Nam and expect everyone there to cater to me! I would either choose not to live there since I can't freakin' communicate, or I would learn the language. And anyway, why wouldn't you WANT to learn a new language if you had the choice?

I'm from Texas, and I currently live in San Antonio. We obviously have a very large hispanic culture here, but there are VERY few places that I go to where I NEED to know Spanish. For the most part, everyone here is pretty darn well integrated. Those that aren't seem pretty happy with the whole situation too. I don't even know why this is an issue at the federal level...

Ok...enough of my soapbox.

Anything from the other side of the fence?
__________________
Joeninpo

The tyrant custom, most grave Senators,
Hath made the flinty and steel couch of war
My thrice-driven bed of down
Reply With Quote Submit this thread to digg Submit this thread to del.icio.us
  #3  
Old 07-29-2006, 10:53 PM
Bear's Avatar
Bear Bear is offline
Minister of Sportsbook

 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St. Louis
Age: 35
Posts: 115
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Rep Power: 0
Bear is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Foreign-language Ballots: Are they good for America?

I'm also originally from the San Antonio area (New Braunfels) and my Mom is from Mexico. She worked her butt off to learn English as an adult, and it drives me crazy to see hispanics not embrace English as the language of success in America. I'm all for holding on to your ancestral language, but if you don't learn the language of the country you live in, you'll forever be beholden to someone else for your well-being.

Joe--One thing; I wouldn't say French will never be a global language. It's always been considered the international language of diplomacy. Of course, that's only out of tradition these days and was functionally replaced by English long ago.
__________________
Hook 'em
Bear


Texas Longhorns
2005 College World Series Champs
2005 NCAA Football Champs
Reply With Quote Submit this thread to digg Submit this thread to del.icio.us
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +9. The time now is 05:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
All rights reserved USFK Forums