![]() |
|
Welcome to the Korea Discussion Forums! You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. Take a look at the list of the forum features here. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
|
|
|||||||
| Forums | Arcade | Gallery | Links | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | |
| Classifieds | Articles | Quizzes | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| The Lounge - 라운지 Talk about anything here. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Do korean consider themselves to be Turanians?
Hello Korean brothers and sisters.
There is a theory that Korean might be related to Mongols and Turks etc.. Do you think there is a truth behind this? You may learn about Turanian culture here if you do not know what I mean; www.turania.com |
| Google Ads |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Do korean consider themselves to be Turanians?
Quote:
Im Korean. We have no relation to Turks, absolutely. But, Mongolian is our ancestor. Korean's face is the same with Mongolians. Chinese, Japanese, Korean is from Mongolians. Do you understand ? So, Korean has no relation to Turks, absolutely ! Oh....Btw, I know that you dispatched troops to Korea in Korean war,1950. Thanks a lot about that. Last edited by shsong21 : 09-22-2007 at 12:10 PM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Do korean consider themselves to be Turanians?
So do you consider Koreans to be Sino-tibetan?
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Do korean consider themselves to be Turanians?
Sino-... what ?
What is that ? Im very sorry but say that again ? |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Obviously Koreans are heavily influenced in ancestry by Mongolians. Where or if the Turks played a part in early Mongolian Ancestry is something I have not studied. As most believe the human family started in the area of the fertile crescent, we should be better informed before making such statements such as "Absolutely" or "Absolutely not"...
But I would venture to say Koreans, Chinese and especially the Japanese would dearly love to call themselves a "Pure" race, as the Germanic peoples prefer to believe! Proof of any such purity would be as hard to prove as would be one religious group's faith's superiority over another! |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Do korean consider themselves to be Turanians?
"Sino-" as a prefix means "Chinese".
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Do korean consider themselves to be Turanians?
I'm sorry but I don't know Chinese.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Do korean consider themselves to be Turanians?
No, I just meant that pureturk must have been asking if you consider Koreans to be Chinese/Tibetan (probably because of the Mongol reference from earlier in the discussion).
Just like the formal number system in Korea is referred to as "Sino-Korean" because the numbers are derived from the Chinese. Hope that helps. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Do korean consider themselves to be Turanians?
Link to a paper titled: "The Origin of the Korean People: Who Are The Koreans?"
http://www.kimsoft.com/2004/go-chosun.htm
__________________
Turk Last edited by Turk : 12-28-2007 at 12:13 PM. Reason: To fix mis-quote |