Welcome to the Korea Discussion Forums!

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. Take a look at the list of the forum features here. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Go Back   USFK Forums > Korea Central - 한국 지역 > Military in Korea - 주한미군 > Yongsan Garrison (Seoul) - 서울
User Name
Password
Forums Arcade Gallery Links Register FAQ Members List Calendar
Classifieds Articles Quizzes Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read  

Yongsan Garrison (Seoul) - 서울 Discuss issues related to Yongsan and Seoul.


Google
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-05-2006, 07:03 AM
GI Korea's Avatar
GI Korea GI Korea is offline
Junior Officer

 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Where ever the Army sends me.
Posts: 1,003
Country:

Thanks: 1
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts
Rep Power: 0
GI Korea is an unknown quantity at this point
[GI Korea] More Cushy Jobs in Yongsan

Published: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 06:03:38 +0900


It looks like some our international allies that took part in the Korean War may get some cushy jobs in Yongsan courtesy of the US Congress:



The U.S. Congress has asked the Department of Defense and the State Department to report on chances of reviving UN Command in Korea, a body nominally still made up of countries that took part on the South¿s side in the Korean War. The move comes in the midst of plans to dissolve Korea-U.S. Combined Forces Command, return wartime operational control of forces to Korea and other signs of a lesser role for the U.S. forces in the country.


(...)


One of the conditions of the armistice that halted the Korean War was that the UNC has to approve any freight or equipment that crosses through the DMZ -- a question that would become pertinent if the reconnected inter-Korean railways ever start operating. UNC members the U.K., Australia, and New Zealand have signaled they would increase the number of staff officers in Korea in response to a recent UNC request.


U.S. Forces Commander Burwell Bell earlier told a congressional hearing he planned to revive the international alliance by increasing international staff at the UNC, which is now effectively in sole U.S. control, writing up emergency and operational plans, and training observation.



So what exactly would these additional international staff do all day with no actual army to over see?*


Tags: USFK


Ads by AdGenta.com



Read More...
Reply With Quote Submit this thread to digg Submit this thread to del.icio.us
Google Ads
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +9. The time now is 11:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
All rights reserved USFK Forums